The first month with five Wednesdays since the new blog launched, which was this last August, I decided on the spur of the moment to ask my readers to propose a topic for the fifth post of the month, and a substantial plurality of them asked for a discussion of reincarnation, which they duly got. The level of interest and the quality of the conversations that resulted were more than enough to make me decide to try it again, and so when November rolled around the same question got asked. The competition this time was a good deal fiercer, with quite a few readers asking for an essay on democratic syndicalism and other alternatives to the asphyxiatingly narrow range of systems of political economy that most people these days are willing to think about.
Tweet Families facing an addiction often become freelance detectives, inspecting the clues left behind by the substance abuse and trying to develop a narrative that encapsulates the problem.
Often, families spend a significant amount of time wrestling with the concept of origin. It can seem like a silly question, but it can be of vital importance to families facing an addiction issue.
After all, problems that can be based on genetics might appear over and over again, hitting the next generation with the same force seen in current family members. Problems based on environment and nurturing, however, might be easier to tackle, as they involve only habit and behavior.
These are the problems that might be easily stopped in just one person, without worrying about the impact on the generations yet to come. Unfortunately, when it comes to addiction, the concept of nature and nurture is hard to untangle.
Genetic Concerns People who develop an alcoholism issue must choose to drink repeatedly. Loving the way the alcohol moves in the body, on the other hand, could make an alcoholism problem more likely, as someone who likes the drug is more likely to drink it again.
For example, research highlighted by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism suggests that people of Asian decent have a specific type of gene that makes the experience of alcohol unpleasant.
For people with this gene, drinking alcohol means feeling flush and faint, and perhaps slightly nauseated.
On the other hand, research published in the journal Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research suggests that some people have a gene variant that allows signals of pleasure to move quickly from one portion of the brain to the other, when alcohol is in play.
People like this are more vulnerable to the behavioral changes alcohol can bring, so one little sip causes a big shift in the way they feel and the manner in which they act. Intense changes spurred by a substance are typically associated with an increased risk of addiction, as the brain tends to take note of the cause and effect, and ask for more drugs in return.
Someone with this kind of gene might move from social drinking to solo binge drinking in no time at all, mainly because of the genes involved. This is an important finding, as people who are impulsive are typically likely to: Act before thinking through the consequences Escalate their behaviors Seem unable to stop a behavior once it starts This is the kind of behavior that could allow a person to move from simple drinking to full abuse in no time at all, and a study conducted by researchers from the University of Michigan Health System suggests that genetic factors tend to explain different impulsivity levels between people.
As a result, just having this gene variant could allow people to make catastrophic choices regarding alcohol. Genes can also play upon one another.
For example, a person with the genes for a predisposition for enjoying alcohol could be more likely to drink again, once the first drink has been digested. If this same person had the gene for impulsivity, that person might also choose to keep drinkingeven when stopping would be a better option.
For people like this, runaway genes seem to be almost exclusively responsible for the poor choices they make. In fact, it could play an important role in both the introduction to alcohol and the choice to keep drinking.According to Wikipedia the nature versus nurture debates concern the relative importance of an individual’s innate qualities (“nature”, i.
e. nativism, or innatism) versus personal experiences (“nurture”, i. e.
empiricism or behaviorism) in determining or causing individual differences in . In fact you cannot differentiate the theory of nature vs. nurture. It’s coming to light with more and more research that they are closely related and cannot be separated.
Perhaps biology plays a larger role or maybe even the environment depending upon the individual with the addiction.
The Course to Better Grades. With a little help from experts, you’ll be on your way up, pronto. Here’s how it works. Search We scour the world for brainiac educators, many with masters and PhDs in their respective fields from fancy universities across the world. Conclusion.
Behaviourism is very much about nurture when it comes to the nature vs. nurture debate as it focuses on external stimuli affecting behaviour.
Agression Nurture Vs Nature Essay Science in society essay ‘Is aggression down to nature or nurture’ discuss both sides of this argumentThere is strong evidence to suggest that aggression is an emotion which many people experience on a daily basis.
This leads to great debate concerning whether aggression is stimulated by nature or nurture. Unfortunately, when it comes to addiction, the concept of nature and nurture is hard to untangle. There’s compelling evidence on both sides, and sometimes, a person might have a risk from both genetic factors and environmental concerns.